Oct 08, · The evaluation provides a description of the aims, findings and arguments put forward in the article, a critical appraisal of the issues, theories and concepts included in the article and an assessment of the sources of information used in the article Guidelines on how to write a critical analysis of an article Writing an article analysis essay requires you focus onto the details of the given copy. The analysis should not be very elaborate but more of a review of the article. This implies that it should be shorter
How to Write a Critical Evaluation Essay
and published in in the British Journal of Cancer, volumepages The evaluation provides a description of the aims, findings and arguments put forward in the article, a critical appraisal of the issues, theories and concepts included in the article and an assessment of the sources of information used in the article. The title of the article — How traumatic is breast cancer?
Post-traumatic stress symptoms PTSS and risk factors for severe PTSS at 3 and 15 months after surgery in a nationwide cohort of Danish women treated for primary breast cancer — is an accurate representation of what is included in the article, as the article, indeed, talks about PTSS and risk factors for severe PTSS in Danish women treated for primary breast cancer. The title is a very accurate description of what is included in the article.
The clarity of the aim, coupled with the clear and accurately descriptive title, allows the reader of the article to orient themselves as to what the authors will be discussing in the body of the article. It is easy for the reader to feel that the authors ha a clear idea of what their research was, how to write a critical evaluation of an article, where it fits in the body of research and literature in this subject and, on this basis, how they would carry how to write a critical evaluation of an article research out.
The objectives of the article are made not made so clear by the authors, but it can be understood, from the very clear stated aim, that the objective of the article was to determine what the prevalence and risk factors are for PTSS in primary breast cancer survivors in Denmark.
In terms of the rationale for the study, the authors make clear, in the first sentence of the abstract, that the literature in this area, whilst extensive, is not concurrent, in that there are variations, across the reports in the research, as to the prevalence of PTSS in women living with and recovering from breast cancer.
In terms of the inclusion criteria for the sample, it was important that all women included had no history of other cancers and that the women could read and write in Danish to ensure that they fully understood, and could respond to, the questionnaire used to collect the data.
This was to ensure that the women had all received the same treatment, at the same time, to ensure that any potential bias was reduced. Bias could have been introduced, for example, if the women selected for study had been in recovery for longer or if the women had all received different treatment modalities or if the women was still living with breast cancer: by selecting women on the basis of a certain date for the surgery, and a certain treatment modality, and by applying the strict inclusion criteria, the researchers minimised the potential effects of bias, ensuring as high a possible validity and reliability for the results found Gerrish and Lacey, As Roberts et al.
For research to be helpful, the research process and the results reported need to be as clear and transparent as possible: misleading information will cause the reader to doubt the research process and, therefore, how to write a critical evaluation of an article, the validity of the results reported.
These variables were collected in order to test, statistically, the relationships between the degree of PTSS found in the patients and all of the variables, to see if there were any pervasive links between the presence of PTSS and any particular variable. Comparisons between the independent variables and the PTSS score, as measured via the IES, were conducted using chi-squared tests. It can be seen, therefore, that the statistical tests used were appropriate for the type of data collected: the use of non-parametric tests, for example, was appropriate, given the fact that the variances were found to differ markedly amongst respondents Bryman and Cramer, The use of how to write a critical evaluation of an article chi-squared test in this case is also appropriate, as discussed in Siegelgiven the fact that all participants were independent and that frequency data was collected from the participants via the questionnaire.
Overall, then, how to write a critical evaluation of an article, the selection and use of the statistical tests to analyse the data were appropriate, giving confidence that the data analysis was conducted appropriately and that the results found from the analyses are reliable. Regarding the predictors of PTSS in women surviving breast cancer, the presence of severe PTSS was related to older age at 3 months post-surgery.
Higher educational attainment was strongly related to a reduced chance of developing PTSS. Given the strong link between these factors and the development of PTSS, there is an argument to be made that women patients with breast cancer who have such risk factors should be offered counselling pre- and post-surgery in order to be able to help to mitigate the risk factors and help these women to avoid developing PTSS. Regarding the conclusion of the article, in terms of whether the conclusions drawn are justified, as has been discussed in the critique of the article, the authors took every precaution possible to ensure that the sample selection and data collection were designed in such a way that the risk of bias was minimised, this increasing the reliability and validity of the findings, and conclusions, presented in the article.
This means that the conclusions drawn are not only justified, in terms of the aim of the article, but also that the conclusions from the article can be considered robust and, therefore, trustworthy. The significance how to write a critical evaluation of an article the article, in terms of the contribution it makes to knowledge in this area is great. Additionally, given the large sample size of the article and the rigour of the data collection and data analysis, the results obtained can be argued to be very robust Creswell, and, therefore, of high reliability.
Knowing what factors cause women to experience greater levels of trauma post-surgery is very useful as this knowledge can be used to target those women at greater risk of suffering PTSS and, equipped with this knowledge, delivering counselling to these women to ensure that their risk of developing PTSS is lessened. In general terms, then, the article — if its findings were transmitted through the general media — would be helpful to women as women could, if they were at risk of developing PTSS following surgery, seek help themselves from their medical team.
As PTSS has been linked to depression and other psychiatric problems in breast cancer survivors Morrill et al. Andersen, M. et al. Frequent search for sense by long-term breast cancer survivors associated with reduced HRQOL.
Womens Health 47, Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. Taylor Francis. Creswell, J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, how to write a critical evaluation of an article.
Morrill, E. The interaction of post-traumatic growth and post-traumatic stress symptoms in predicting depressive symptoms and quality of life. Psychooncology 17, Roberts, P. Reliability and validity in research. Nursing Standard 20, Tjemsland, L.
Posttraumatic distress symptoms in operable breast cancer III: status one year after surgery. Breast Cancer 47, Tags: Critical evaluation of a research articlecritical evaluation of the research article entitledost-traumatic stress symptoms PTSS and risk factors for severe PTSS.
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it. Including student tips and advice. Click here to ask a question about this article.
Home Our Story Why WritePass? Critical evaluation of a research article rodrigo October 8, WritePass - Essay Writing - Dissertation Topics [TOC] Introduction References Related. Subscribe If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it. Commercialising smallholder agriculture in developing countries: Arguments for and challenges to implementation ».
Subscribe Enter your email address below to receive helpful student articles and tips. Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! ID: 2. Top Posts on WPJournal Emergence Of Artificial Intelligence In Writing Industry. The WritePass Journal © The WritePass Journal. How to write a critical evaluation of an article rights reserved. Premium WordPress Themes.
How to Write a Critical Review the Most Easy Way
, time: 7:22How to Write a Critical Analysis of an Article
Oct 08, · The evaluation provides a description of the aims, findings and arguments put forward in the article, a critical appraisal of the issues, theories and concepts included in the article and an assessment of the sources of information used in the article Guidelines on how to write a critical analysis of an article Writing an article analysis essay requires you focus onto the details of the given copy. The analysis should not be very elaborate but more of a review of the article. This implies that it should be shorter
No comments:
Post a Comment